![]() Similarly, Luke Kornet's $2.4 million non-guaranteed salary is probably worth holding onto. The team traded for Mike Muscala, and while he wasn't a significant part of the postseason run, his $3.5 million team option may be economical enough for the Celtics to take. That may be a non-starter, barring the team finding elsewhere to cut-but Williams seems the most expendable in Mazzulla's rotation.Īfter losing the season to a knee injury, Danilo Gallinari is sure to opt into his $6.8 million for 2023-24. Paying Williams this summer, even as low as the NTMLE, would put the Celtics at least $3.6 million over the second apron for 2023-24 and locks that in for multiple years (with Brown returning). But paying both Brown and Williams is prohibitive long-term if the second apron is the line Boston won't cross. Staying under the second apron is a possibility with Brown in a standard, non-supermax extension. Most NBA franchises will treat the second apron like a hard cap, but it remains to be seen where the Celtics fall in that category. A team paying for a contender now may lose out on a high lottery position when the time comes to rebuild. The last one is the most extreme punishment pushing a team's first-round pick to the end of the list seven years later. Initially set at $179.5 million for 2023-24, growing to potentially $188.5 million for 2024-25, the second apron includes severe restrictions, including the loss of the taxpayer mid-level exception, limited trade flexibility and (starting with 2024-25) frozen draft picks. ![]() Will Boston end up too deep in the tax that the franchise nears or exceeds the new second apron? Williams may project to be in the $15 million+ range, but only if one of those teams is willing to take the chance that the Celtics won't match.Īnother 11 teams could have the non-taxpayer mid-level exception (NTMLE, projected to start at $12.2 million)-subject to change based on trades, player options and non-guaranteed salary decisions-but that's a number probably match.īut Williams raises a more significant picture concern tied to Brown's extension. Last year, Grant played 27.3 minutes a game in the playoffs, but his role shrunk to 17.7 (with some "did-not-play, coach's decision" interspersed).Īpproximately seven teams project to have sizable cap space this summer to give him an offer sheet. Grant Williams will be a restricted free agent looking for a long-term commitment. ![]() Should he depart as a free agent to another team without his rights, that number would dip to $181.5 million over four years.ĭo we live in an NBA world where a $189.1 million offer from Boston this July, in lieu of the supermax, should be considered an insult?īrown can choose to wait to see what opportunities lie ahead, but it would take a lot for anyone to turn down that level of financial security.īoston can always look to trade him (pre- or post-extension) and may even explore that path to gauge the market, but the most likely outcome seems to be Brown getting enough from the Celtics to stay.īrown isn't the only decision the Celtics need to make this summer. Non-supermax free agency in July 2024 could pay $244.8 million over five by Boston (or by a team that previously acquired him via trade). If Brown were traded, his new team would be limited to extending at $189.1 million after a six-month waiting period over four additional years (starting at $42.2 million). ![]() The exact figures wouldn't be set until June 30, 2024. If he's a top-10 player, then he will get maxed out next summer in free agency by someone, if not Boston.Īssuming a $140.7 million salary cap for the 2024-25 season, a supermax deal in Boston would start at $49.2 million ($285.6 million over five years). The next step is, "At what price?"īrown is heading into the final year of his deal and, by his All-NBA Second Team ranking, is eligible for what is commonly referred to as a supermax extension. The results, ECF letdown aside, suggest they should. The core question is, "Do the Celtics believe the Tatum/Brown duo is worth investing in long-term?" Just because a team can pay a player a specific price doesn't mean it should. Those voices have been relatively silent since Boston's 2021-22 run, but the decision is, in fact, looming. The incoming collective bargaining agreement creates new challenges, with highly limiting and punitive rules for heavy spenders.įor years, competing executives have expressed the notion that the Celtics should break up its pair of All-Star wings, but since Tatum joined Brown in 2017, the duo has made four conference finals, including last year's run to the NBA Finals. The franchise faces several more difficult choices as Jaylen Brown nears free agency.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |